DOW-UAP-D098, Filmanalyse unidentifizierter Objekte, 1953
Offizielle Beschreibung
Diese Akte enthält ein Memorandum zur Bewertung zweier Filme durch das U.S. Naval Photographic Interpretation Center, die angeblich unidentifizierte Flugobjekte zeigen, aufgenommen 1950 in Montana beziehungsweise 1952 in Utah. Die Akte dokumentiert den Analyseprozess des Zentrums, die Annahmen, die den Grad seiner Zuversicht einschränkten, vorläufige Schlussfolgerungen sowie Empfehlungen für künftige Untersuchungen. Das Zentrum kam allgemein zu der Einschätzung, dass die im Film gezeigten Objekte Merkmale aufwiesen, die weder mit natürlichen Phänomenen noch mit allgemein bekannten Luft- und Raumfahrttechnologien vereinbar waren. Das Memorandum dokumentiert die Empfehlung des Zentrums für eine besser ausgestattete Untersuchung zur Bestätigung seiner vorläufigen Feststellungen, wobei ein Mangel an Finanzmitteln und Personal angeführt wird. Die beigefügten Diagramme vergleichen die Leuchtkraft des Films mit der scheinbaren Winkelgröße der Phänomene unter Anwendung zeitgenössischer mathematischer Modellierungs- und photogrammetrischer Analysetechniken.
✦ KI-Zusammenfassung
Ein 23-seitiger Bericht mit der Einstufung "Confidential — Security Information", später freigegeben (mit dem Stempel "DECLASSIFIED MVD 67905"), von dem 20 Seiten lesbar sind; der Rest besteht aus Diagrammen, Grafiken und fotografischen Auswertungen, die sich der OCR-Erkennung widersetzten, darunter drei leere oder zu stark beschädigte Seiten (17, 19, 20) sowie eine Seite (21), bei der die OCR-Verarbeitung ein Zeitlimit überschritt. Der inhaltliche Text (Seiten 3-9) ist ein Fortschrittsbericht-Schreiben des Officer in Charge, U.S. Naval Photographic Interpretation Center, Washington, D.C. (Aktenkennzeichen 01/HWW), an den Director of Naval Intelligence (OP-322H4D), unter Bezugnahme auf vorherige Korrespondenz der Air Force und der Navy von Oktober 1952 bis Februar 1953. Er dokumentiert die Analyse der Photogrammetry Division eines 16-mm-Farbfilms unidentifizierter Objekte, die am 2. Juli 1952 in Utah fotografiert wurden (etwa 30 Fuß Film), sowie zusätzliches Filmmaterial aus Montana von 1950. Die Methoden umfassten das Projizieren von Einzelbildern mit 22-facher Vergrößerung auf eine Mattglasscheibe zur Positionsbestimmung sowie densitometrische Messungen mit einem Densichron Modell 2150 zur Verfolgung relativer Leuchtkraft und Größe. Der Bericht beschreibt drei Gruppen blau-weißer, scheiben-/linsenförmiger Objekte (geschätzt 16 bis 95 Fuß Durchmesser, bei Annahme einer Beobachtungsdistanz von 5 Meilen), die sich auf einer elliptischen, gegen den Uhrzeigersinn verlaufenden Bahn bewegten, mit errechneten Geschwindigkeiten in Utah von 375 bis 2.457 mph und Beschleunigungen von bis zu etwa 965 g. Das Filmmaterial aus Montana, analysiert gegen im Bild sichtbare irdische Referenzobjekte, ergab niedrigere, aber weiterhin anomale Werte, wobei die OCR-Erkennung dieser spezifischen Zahlen zu stark beeinträchtigt ist, um sie verlässlich zu zitieren. Hinzugezogene Astronomie- und Physikexperten konnten die Aufnahmen keinem bekannten Naturphänomen zuordnen; Vögel, Flugzeuge und Ballone wurden ausgeschlossen, und die Mehrheit vertrat die Ansicht, dass es sich bei den Objekten um Lichtquellen und nicht um reflektierende Oberflächen handelte. Eine spektrophotometrische Folgeanalyse des Utah-Films wird als noch ausstehend vermerkt.
Mit KI aus der Originaldatei erstellt — kann Fehler enthalten.
▸Transkript(20 von 23 Seiten lesbar)
[PAGE 1] DECLASSIFIED Authority: BUAER ROUTE SHEET wavacr-s014 (REV. 5-52) wohetabea ; RTG. DATE nly TG. DATE 5 WT. i N : ‘IVISTON DIVISIO IR Ra DIVIS!ON ak, nec. [RELo. DIVISION CHIEF OF BUAER (AER) AERO. STOS. GP. (AG) ASS'T CHIEF FOR AIRBORNE EQUIP. {AE} MTL. & SERVICES (4) ALDE (A) DEP. ASST. CHIEF GENERAL INSP. CONTRACTS (cT) ASST. RES. TRA. (SR) ARMAMENT SMALL BUS. SP (S8) DEPUTY 4 ASS'T CHIEF ial OF BUREAU (1) DES1GN ELEMENTS (DE) —— INDUSTRIAL PL. EXECUTIVE OFFICE (12) ELECTRONICS INSPECTION ADM. SERVICES MAINTENANCE EVALUAT |ON AIRCRAFT LOG EXP. PROGRAM (EP )) COWNSEL EWE} BY NAVaip _/ GUIDED MISSILES (GM)| HLASE PROJ Wry FISCAL 1 foal ry rv ral —¥. Ff=s IER ED nace —/ 3 AIRGRAFT tac) HER CHT HAR C (PHY 4 MIL. REQUIREM, MR} ay: 1 s / CA LL PERSONNEL ; POWER PLANT ) PRODUCT | ON (PD) PUBLICATIONS \JRESEARCH PLANS COORD. HWSHIPS INSTALL. (S1)] SHORE ESTAB. ASS'T CHIEF FOR , Le: RES. & DEVEL. (2) anaes fai DEP. ASST. CHIEF PATENT COUNSEL (PL) EXECUTIVE ASST. ASW COORD. ASST. | USAF LIAISON ROB-SPEC. ASST. : ACE FOR ADDITIONAL ROUT INGS ADMINISTRATIVE ASST. ‘\ [a \ 7 ACTION DES!|RED \T T ACT|ON DESIRED F.qRTG ACTION DESIRED Expedite information and return Prepare reply tor signature of: 24 hour reply requested Recommendation and return Confer with Return with aati req. NO FUR [Ow NECESSARY 7 -=: we EE ol : (Sigsature) he A o . Red- rou lings shall be made and changed anly by Comm. & Files Br. At 2 gther routings shal) be na Indicate er of routing for both incoming and outgoing correspondente by consecutive numbers. 3. X — Indic activity preparing reply. (Place in "RTG & ACT,* column, To left of column jf numeral already insertec, } « 0 = Indicates routing of pink copy after correspondence is mailed. (If numerical sequence desired indicate to left of column.) + All numerical routings must be jnitialled orior to mailing, indicate instructions by placing numerical routings in appropriate box in lower right nand corner. This form is UNCLASSIFIED when Diank and unattached. 25 CONADENHAL- SECURITY INFORMATION [PAGE 2] (Attach Correspondence Here) €CONABENFHAL COMMENTS 1. In order that persons making comments may be readily identified, comments shal! be numbered, dated, legibly signed with the Last Name and Initials, Rank if any, Section, and telephone extension. By order of the Chief of the Bureau, material attached to this route sheet shall not be removed. (See AD 3-1) 3. Extra copies may be removed, but the Record Copy (identified by the control number) must remain attached at all times. WAVAER 2414 (REV. 1-52) (BACK) (Do not write below thts Line) ATTACH ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON LETTER SIZE (8x104) SHEETS OWLY. NUMBER ALL COMMENTS IN DATE ORDER. SECURITY INFORMATION [PAGE 3] U. S. NAVAL PHOTOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION CENTER U. S. NAVAL RECEIVING STATION Washington 25, D. C. Code 01/HWW/ibh y, J12 44 Serial: { SECURITY INFORMATION From: Officer in Charge To: Director of Naval Intelligence (OP-322H4D) Subj: Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects; progress report on e Ref: (a) Conf ltr DNI Op322y5/rtm, dtd 27 Oct 1952 with enclosures thereto Conf memo, Chief, Topical Division, USAF, AFOIN 2A2, dtd 24 Nov 1952 with enclosures thereto PIC Conf ltr 01/HWW/gel, ser 0263 dtd 5 Dec 1952 Rest memo, Chief, Topical Division, USAF, AFOIN 2a2, ata 16 Feb 1953 Enel: Charts 2-13 1. Reference (a) is a request from U. S. Air Force for the interpretation of movies of unidentified objects taken in Utah, 2 July 1952. Included among the enclosures are approximately 30 feet of processed, 16mm color motion picture film and a list of questions for guidance in determining the type of analysis desired. Reference (b) requested interpretation of additional movies taken in Montana, 1950. This report supercedes reference (c) and presents the test procedures and methods designed to answer the questions contained in enclosure 7 of reference (a). The results and analysis were performed by the Photogrammetry Division, Evaluation Department of this Center and do not necessarily represent the official attitude of the Depart- ment of the Navy or this Center. DECLASSIFIED MVD 67905 2. Tests and Procedure. a. Plots. The film exposed in Utah is in very poor condition; dry, brittle, and with a tendency to break. After initial viewing, duplication of the film was performed in order to \preserve the film. In the duplication process some color correction was made to permit better viewing of the objects. To prepare plots of the objects, a stop frame projector was rigidly mounted at a fixed distance from a finely-ground glass screen. The magnification was 22 times giving a format size of 14.2" wide. This proved very satisfactory and provided a shadow free image upon which overlay plots could be made. nanan RE Ra ea SECURITY INFORMATION DUVey Ee SECURI TY INFORMATION [PAGE 4] Code 01/HWW/2bdh Ji2 Serial: oo See SECURITY INFORMATION Subj}: Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects; progress report on A preliminary detailed stud, of the Utah film was made and it was decided that: &@. Brightly colored spots of red and green lasting only one or two frames were not to be considered. b. Water spots could be detected easily and eliminated from the study. ec. The color of the objects was fairly constant as blue-white. ad. Size and luminosity of an object varied through-out the film. For convenience in interpretation, the film was divided into three parts, each part being considered an entity. Part I consisted of the footage taken at f8; Part II, the footage taken at f16 with a panning motion; and Part III, the footage taken at f16 during which the camera was held steady. Three definite groups of lights were observed through- out the film and plots were recorded as follows: TABLE I PLOTS OF POSITIONS Parts Control Chart SE TEE Holding to lower group Not enclosed Boa Be § Holding to one object 2 and 3 and azimuth of another Arbitrary 1/2 inch correction per frame for panning Holding to frame outline One image held to base line. Every tenth frame to show changes within apparent formations ALL Terrestial Objects 7a and 7b Sa eae SECURITY INFORMATION a | [PAGE 5] < oe Serial: “Code 01/HWW/lbh Ji2 CONFIDENT EAS SECURITY INFORMATION Subj: Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects; progress report on b. Densitometric tests: Densitometric data were obtained with a Densichron, Model 2150 manufactured b, the Welch Scientific Company. The Densichron has a scale range of 0-3. The procedure was to project each frame at approximately 22 times magnifidation onto a finely-grained-glass screen. The back- ground (sky) was then measured at several places and the density set to 3.0 (variations in background densities were in the order of 0.02 and were regarded as uniform). A set of three readings were made of each of seven objects in Part I, and of the single object in Part III of the Utah Film. Readings were made of the entire Montana film. Enclosure (Sa and 8b) are graphs of the density readings obtained of the two lower groups of objects in frames 1-129 of the Utah film. Enclosure (9) is a density graph of the single object (94 frames) in Part III. Enclosure (10) is a graph where six successive Densichron readings were averaged and advanced one reading each deter- minant. Of the Montana film, densities were plotted as above and are enclosures (11) and (12). The results of the density readings may be questioned in that these objects varied in size so that at the minimum sizes the densichron probe was measuring the entire object, and at the maximum size the probe was measuring only a portion of the objects. Because of this situation only the largest readings obtained b.~ scanning the objects were used. It is understood that normal procedure would be to read the entire object. This was impossible with the equipment on hand. In addition the film, with which this investigation was conducted, is a duplicate of a copy. This raises the question as to whether the central portion of the objects were burnt out during the duplication processing. Density readings were made to compare the clear areas and the objects. It was found. that the minimum difference is 0.4. This indicates that relative luminosity may still be obtained with the pro- cedure used. Concurrent with the density readings, relative sizes of the objects were noted in order to correlate distance and luminosity. Enclosure (13) is a plot of the same object wherein the relationship of distance and luminosity can be detected in Utah film. 3. Answers to Questions. Au Answers keyed to the questions contained in enclosure (7) of reference (a) are hereby presented. They supercede those contained in reference (c) and present the final analysis.as requested. <= " T i Cae tt jo WoT vy = SECURITY INFORMATION SECURITY INFOR MATION [PAGE 6] “Code O1/HWW/ibh Ji2 Serial: CONFIDENT EAL- SECURITY INFORMATION Subj: Interpretation of Movies of. Unidentified Objects; progress report on 1. Analysis of the graph correlating luminosity and size indicate that as the luminosit» of the objects increase, the size is larger also. This could be the effect of viewing directly, a reflecting surface. This is considered not probable because of the length of time they were viewed continuously on the film, approxi- mately 90 seconds, and because of the angle through which they were photographed, approximately 60 degrees. It is felt that if these images are reflective surfaces, blinking would occur during a period of 90 seconds while passing through an angle of 60 degrees when photographed at the rate of 16 frames per second. This premise would permit highly reflective balloons or spheroids to be a possibility. However, the velocity and acceleration computations (sub paragraph ©) rule this possibility out. It appears, therefore, that if these objects are a reflecting surface, they are of a design, speed, and power not commonly known. The velocity and acceleration attributed to the objects may be caused by light reflected off a highly reflective surface onto an atomospheric screen where a slight angular turn of the reflective surface would appear as high acceleration. This possibilit, is considered not probable because of the sun angle and atmospheric condition reported at the time of photography and because of the variations in luminosity which, under the above conditions would remain constant. i] It is the majority opinion of the group conducting this analysis that these images are light sources. This will explain the non-blinking and variations in luminosity - but not the velocity or acceleration factors. In either case, light source or reflective surface, it appears as if the objects are of a nature which we are not able to identify in terms of natural phenomena or commonly known man-made objects. 2s ere is no indication of what kind of objects could have caused the images except that they must be of a construction, design, and material not commonly known. This is indicated by the computed acceleration rate and elocity (answer 3). For the same reasons, birds, aircraft and balloons are ruleg out. 3. An analysis of the charts relative to movement indicate that there were group and individual movement. Within a group it appears as if the individual objects were moving counter-clock-wise along an elliptical or similar track. Thus when two objects crossed the camera line of sight they will appear to fuse into one. As they continued along their paths it will appear as if one object became two. This occured at reglar intervals at approximately every 25th frame as plotted in charts 5a and 5b. Con attr SATE IR on A SECURITY INFORMATION aan) } TD uu ATY IF FORMATION [PAGE 7] -Code 01/HWW/1bh Ji2 Serial: ed SECURITY INFORMATION Subj: Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects; progress report on 4. All objects appear to have the same characteristics in regards to shape, color, size and relative motion. 5. The shape of the objects appears to be oblate or disk shaped, color; blue-white, and maximum and minimum size; 95 and 16 feet. The size is based on the assumption that the objects are five miles from the observer. 6. Fade in and fade out of the objects were analyzed as in 3 above. In this case the group movement was such that the distance between the objects and camera was increased so that the objects could not be recorded on the film thereby causing the apparent fade- out. Fade-in as attributed to a shortening of the distance from the fade-out area to the camera station. f- Plots of the groups indicate that the objects move counter- clock-wise relative to the axis of flight path. However, nothing has been detected which indicates motion of the individual objects about their own axis although this motion appears to be likely. 8. In determining the velocity of the objects three assumptions were made: " The camera was held steady during Part III of the film. The objects were moving perpendicular to the optical axis, and ec. The objects were five miles from the camera. It is obvious that (b) is a fallacy; however, this assumption will give the minimum velocity and the actual velocity is greater than computed. The assumption that the objects are five miles from the camera is an arbitrary one. However, based on the emulsion speed and focal length, an object 50 feet in diameter and five miles from the camera will be recorded on the film with sufficient resolution to identify major details of the object. It is felt that if these objects were closer than five miles at the time of recording, details would appear on the filn. Velocity is computed to be 3750 mph for a shift of 1 mm per frame if the object is five miles from the observer. From 55 measurements taken from Part III of the Utah film, the maximm and minimum velocities -CORPEDENE TAD SECURITY INFORMATION [PAGE 8] Code 01/HWW/1bh ji2 Serial: SECURITY INFORMATION Subj: Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects; progress report on were 2457 and 375 mph respectively. These figures differ from those given in reference (c) and were computed from measurements obtained under more controlled conditions. Acceleration was determined from the formula = Vf - VO T Acceleration where: final velocity VO = initial velocity T = time = 1/16 second 2 Since "g" is equal to 32.17 ft/sec it was computed that: 21,168 mph/sec 1,104 mph/sec 32,445 mph/sec 2/2 mph/sec 965 g 50 g 14/9 ¢ 12 ¢ Maximum acceleration Minimum acceleration Maximum deceleration Minimum deceleration ee | | Velocit. and acceleration determinations were also made from the Montana film. In this case, terrestial objects appeared in the film and were held to as control. Subsequently, the velocity and acceleration determinations are considered to be more reliable. On the assumption of (b) and (c) above the maximum and minimim velocities of the left object are 13/4 and 361 mph respectfull:;. For the right object they are 1117 and 159 mph. Accelerations were computed as: Left Object Right Object Maximum acceleration mph/sec 14, ss ot 639 ¢g 126h0 = 5/6¢ Minimum acceleration mph/sec a C2 O- Og Maximum deceleration mph/sec 13,16 , = 60l ¢ 14288 = 651g Minimum deceleration mph/sec = Og 9) Og The above determinations were made from a total of 322 measure- ments. It was noted that the acceleration and determinations were in multiples of 12.5 i eae ce fe This may be of significance although no study has been conducted to determine this. 9. Velocity and acceleration were treated in sub-paragraph 8 above. Paragraph 2a indicates the controls used during this investi- gation. SCORPIDEND EAL SECURITY INFORMATION VRITY INFORMATION [PAGE 9] - Code 01/Hww/lbh use Serial: 0108 CONFIDENTIAL SECURITY INFORMATION Subj: Interpretation of Movies of Unidentified Objects; progress report on 10. a. There is no recurring pattern in the relative position of the objects in formation. It appears however, as if the shift in relative positions were regular and that the original formation would be recovered if the continuing action has been recorded. b. No. However, the same formation is maintained with objects changing positions. c. No detection of relative positions being maintained coincidental with movement about their axis. d. Wo detection of undulating motion of objects in phase either in formation or tumbling motion. e. There is evidence of abrupt changes in direction of flight path through fairly large angles. f. Certain objects do appear to remain motionless while other move about. g- Certain objects disappear while still well within the field of view. This is discussed in sub-paragraph 6 above. 4k. Discussion. During the study and investigation of the unidentified objects, the preliminary data uncovered were revealed to experts (with proper security clearance) in the fields of astronomy and physics. Although they presented certain natural phenomena theories to explain the cause of the objects under certain conditions they were not able to do so under the conditions during which the photography was taken, nor were they able to recognize these objects as man-made. As to the results of the investigations being reported, no attempt was made tocorroborate the opinions presented. Because of the lack of proper equipment, money and personnel, the investigation was limited. There are obvious tests which can be conducted to prove or disprove some of the findings presented. It is suggested that these be undertaken. 5. Reference (d) requests spectrophotometric analysis of the Utah film be made. Preliminary plan of test is underway. Copy to: ” QOMUEIA EMS ABE PES CNO (0593) ie SECURITY INFORMATION [PAGE 10] ie es i we eA sit * 44 ai reba 2. a see is FBS a ed ieee pee 3 wt ee SS UESSOR Syogs wens Tse ys pore ss joe carro SI Big a ace aires eeaehce: Be SehEs ee 6 LATE rake A on hig Bs ss Ma fais amit? Si a ‘e Mae Pes prin ares srau’ 3 x be ea ahcatis me ASIEN A pat wi yk he hie z f 9 as 3 Ust Micwue the jamb SH ie ite ot REViEe a 4 chy a tude bs [ ‘ be Re 3 eer ti et ei n my nea ng ees 5a! > vp aun 4 BILIWETIW NOLLO3S SSOuD xavn 2S saver jen + ites Ss y eet ph oe + ‘ i =< be a sor on prey ~ ae Pry Mag 0 oy traps iaaee reste S22: bars ese ere ss SSA tlre vr ere ses Sa Ses co asec sists SSeS i ; Paks Soerc anand eee has pew? REEL | : - cee Baa bonne ef op cbt eb oat me 4- a esd bet ay ; ; 7 i t } ‘ i (oe ea i} fs peg cet 3 i ait Let i { ' avy ye i sreor ' ta 4 | PERM it } ' Serge i f } i oa bee fe Seat Evelity valent t jpn fam 1 Te iy + f ’ Fath ere ne fetinenerk tad HSA now ioe ase SERS A Ewa odes te nat ol 2a | a a3 hey Ba oF : H eee te ot j Eo pene ee te } 2 ESSE SSUES A ES ten iy a. Sa ES r ae Soi ott e eyesye! ti. per tt 6 ae gre oy i Serie np eT as uu iss pay 5. Ride oars res wa Soh 9 3 os ea . ne eee rif are eee Semen oa terre #5 EASA anes — be te cgNigss Ox Tag ih [PAGE 11] SSRs e ties 1 t eS 4 peeyn weno) - abd Lh inn 00-9 BFS BOs Sauce Sass res = = ae i. roe 4 A u {a= fxs ' i? PS tear i } a ‘{ "| fetst 7 | bd. baht ped di te ee ee pheen jell eat ae td + ret] { } ears i . j : Bs Sekt aetie wens Rewes wa w eae eee sees rat { pa Sere ese bre TY ; . on ete Wee pare ewes eer = Bite epee ene an tones oes BI aa ii = Shr ety oat wi ee i i - : Jative } UAB 1 IMS 3) C=R PT nee Ye hows 2 Tests cB SSS be 5 etl SSE 2 4 rite i y SF i nd td be sega suai hi sob eras ee iee asl wap diet th pee i * 4 pee eee LBEse 5 pa bi tat a te Bs xeon sgt My a3: a R13 i mE 72rs RES EIS Ha Eis aay eS be agin osaioad Ee wes ia eers: se am ¢ coins ches. pas Soars sith Ys E ons ; 1 Seen weed ‘ 1 4 \‘ ' } aa se wed. Ue jie Seon oy t { fant ny en ta PERE Miva t ‘ Fran + reas SaaS EGE eS Me [PAGE 12] th Miers Sea in i4 eee taba ak Sere ate wares mt Sees Panen at | Piece oe ys tt } tase pst serait a fmtqey: cee ' ft i 2a meres ened rept H id ee Hes Hes i i Sty a 4 i ay rears 3 j Gh fits Ye } eee oeees = i =—— or ee a ores } peer ~ es Sih fi fe Reet 1 Mepes ' } ab hie aie i { b | eM } | i‘; > i ee ist son foe a es. - - fopetn die eee sepa | } } \ =a aa Nee <4 ape tates i | oe see tte ett aeptere pee if ps yogis : = fp ter os bee i apa naateee * j \ ee Se eae Das Ue \ 1, t \ | ' of yee + { i ~ } i er svers te } u t POOR 225 SIS cae Us villus bel emcaieh GaSe Mapes beed oben yee ia pias tat aegih ae piace he en : na ti Lesa Be SSiee DS | Sen pie eee eee Sect : { * J ' steeper eps hina Sane S waesiars 4 # + + oo MEAS; faeces sates Aas fee STATS ee PER NG 2 wit Ses wath d de titel e neers bare tes ashes Deiat Lt 1 ; tae ral sea pes ee sae in es A t te a ter] ve Soeaadaes Ord ett hae bide pa 3 aby em Bo er age zoe: a4 = ev re :t wee de Smal oT meg Sdep { ‘ test $5 958 Shepard Gunes wes Rios Sere tr) Pas +3 € SF peo die 3 ve pt [PAGE 13] tans i 1 Sep ita secon Sas Feel t i ‘ ; =yirs <i eres tersdeate Bruise wucate sae t : t oad eae dees tacereetes coe bia ; t hepa i t m3 i } t ir f ae cst Pts Shr DoS j ; } re \ | ‘ 4 BOSOM Gewu be pe { rare URitye SALES Se Sen Cae ee ees ees t L f ‘ [PAGE 14] aes te | eae NE —— t ¢ ' } a i sa Fy See t } GU Y \ ; } { 1 os eee we AT = es Sey i + i od iden EE Hoo | ee aes oes ee ee rr ae 4 | t { t Ce ee ee ee a oa fA ee Te ae 4 Pets oa eewearee + coheed : t { i eeemeeee to 4 fae tepe med eet t "ab i re i] See erere 4 a + +f totes ee 54 ij aS ee Be eas ities RS “ee A ry: tye eer dea BUMIS AS At “4 es Virus var } ! seep pebe te ry wos sae | t t t ; seb eeeeteet eres ine once fier fie t — Peed teens ones , { + } tone \ jes ' eel leak i - $ 43 | fee eee tees Shoes Er be he sists ae NEO BI att | ¢ me | sy SDR Sisas BvL EE on ' + ' i SEM teas Co es al | 1 1 ii 4 t ! f 1 i | SE a meer fo ct a aye 4 4 vous NMEPES | r ‘ operecter | 1: tien ae | i 4 en Soret voy f-map rgc3 ney ANE RSS EIU ree * 1 ' | at ~ van Salsas alicia es apart sie aE i bermey ets 1 | ight oie & ee eat 1 i= SEs nw | EGS free, Hf x ‘ 4 { 4 +-{—- ; { 6. + ' | : > j pasts a4 pote pet ; ' =i nee a ats ae bs SB exe rn Woe fa Cade St ae | yao! rie { eaherere { Ninel eae ee teste | { | T pe eee + nah itera ticki cot oer mad Housed i f | t= 4 ay One eee Weaee bel Bo t oa Seen Onis i wens coe Baas Count eee Boe Seas We \ | i} wlbeed ete j H ; I + i ! | i | ‘ i } + esr oe i] 4 i sinponqenet puss 4 Rida Sans fecal tases canta fisted ead ' | Fe tre deere: Bees Sees POS | om Sminal RauRa” Riemannian (nied { ps! on Sieem eens Cee one . ; 4 t ‘3 i | { 7, | 4 i Aoreaass Rab Poe aa + * osure | on oe Spee eos bee ee reel | { i 1 (heey Sama eres Cae . ‘ NRE Sessa sip prea aS amerolet ean } } | aaa seed A i} aoe eos = Fear pe at oo ge. ‘ima, Seleche B t { ' + i" | i 7 ) cu piid Meahl were ir od a , | f re 1. oe pee Meee ee ett | } 4 ! te : = i cise Whar 4 } pees T | eS t | ae i Slats = Say esa iigt iidd “ \ saat apie) ones | i \ — } 1 ' a Pel bam tee + } t 4 | } Part af ' i ra aa = af iat diced i. recordi Rater Fn praia aan pee bp espe ey Ses Ue ee Sees ieee boos Soe Dee f Tt cr coe ae oo Soot ones tree ng. i : { SU isdtaah ; + > ij t Setenpeie topos t poi Aaiwi! aed ibka a ES Gu ‘| pele ete ed ns oop t i ; i 4 tee | i. ot: b 3 i aniateest if ‘ ih eae ‘ ' 5 4 ty { | I on oy S i ' SOEE ce tele Shas hogy d Sa bur R legos es ee } 7 | } Esme see } ; pianos & caeee eau aaa sana GEST PEAR ; ‘ oe ens cone Cores [PAGE 15] Pe vodushtans sate atest - ; . aN eashancaa Gites cexkt We ; nm tf 5 Eon bey : =f. i : SeBah cm ; : =| wee cs #e é Be a ak Sey tea Pat fagi? tpdlahgson sare fe park 5s fy wAWES oy Estes = oe Lind ag rf ; 3 pines. : ‘4 i 3 ie: taecens-sat Se & on Tan Pres stees es eore | ee SSore Peon jhe SEE ORS ECL LEE Se cape tet ree Fe sos es 6 fase sabes oUEag reend cet vie Besors & SD ; t Zo 2) ean 3 - : PTEPA Cue onr CN8 2) LAGE Eb j ; Hea cpt earr ; . sitet. eae tae ie if wads bile: S233 28R BSH ee Smee ze nau aes Yas) VES SESS rae Ke Eb oES Reet baaze sees soeat 4h MEER Bs a My Uahies Bark & EEA OH FT} Wr? eager a pas ages z4 Tabtepnt i be ae a Rit € SARS RUPE S Iv Bs iy : 1 bts cates ceear eS Sie mawiett naa SAGES eeu esaes A SRSES raeee Renenras anous ae cabevn gene sate pan Smupa csees vente & ; : ST ge SHEA WARN NAF ey ey tee Se eae wes ie sees es telides ct Shee soma neeme ase dele SAG abit 8 ry ‘ pI SBSH FIG a £ esi ' mPa teedeet s . ; ea Tal Bae Me i" Sis Sea Te <aes Saas fess: a Gab Oh cawed ot ‘ rsd - obs : ; sie: Sese eet . Tt arn EM: og RE ANGIE KERB Mpweay a2 ; : ; = : au Sy eR EAMES FS La Aoupa ssa tas oa wee bobs pas Giaes ho ele wipe ce 25 Sires : : Fe ARE a Pyiey Gest SOeSE thas ee a ge bbe SEE ys ENE Os Fiche tee ps x : meses 35 iL ree ae ger soa Reve PETE Bot Medes As xis Rew ee Sep ex eek Pear apace supe bar Sees secs oe + eee bees renee oa Bek heed Bea “ vine By ~ ar Ls ACW UA Ham a 9 ehbeiey ow fai = maeyh barhaceeae oes oad Satestal deddeciy Leet oad mbipee Ye soe Ms pees ene ell Rvexs ze LG py Ha Tm MARES wm BER KI fags BASES RAGS (eae +1 ss paryw ay + 4 aka pain bape pte | Stn cts RIES ese toate . a5 ; 7 “pt ops ban taal ts a persen mee eae 255 f oe een See ena? seers Ss Spee eters oer Sey . fs é- “ nos . > he alba pees Vonen ooge ceene apine boots so hogs ot hy t tb ate Ra Xue sranheaees hey [PAGE 16] BGS fen fee pa ete Loos pe : : vet ae oe OL ATR: x race alleen Sn is 5 + ae Ait [PAGE 17] [no legible text — blank or heavily redacted scan] [PAGE 18] ee a4 EM. cr 4s et o8} et CT - tem i a lente ty tt ©. . ae ee i ¢ t, in iE IE FP ~ mor) ‘ od oe Fotnailetanhanemens enemas einai <n > —_— 2 ayrernnasged er . . = SIP ae —.., ~ -_ ool Group os Grevp a [PAGE 19] [no legible text — blank or heavily redacted scan] [PAGE 20] [no legible text — blank or heavily redacted scan] [PAGE 21] [OCR error page 21: Command '['tesseract', '/var/folders/n0/229840bx4kv96czk1b2zsqk80000gn/T/tmpn536l9t1/p20.png', 'stdout', '-l', 'eng', '--psm', '1']' timed out after 120 seconds] [PAGE 22] i Fae 4" ; haw Eas +9, ze in ae ee ‘ vil Le pr Po hoes: eat ai ~f a eee he Ve iets il A [PAGE 23] 30 { posse 1 ' ‘ ' b | i i vant SS nas 3 eet ae sh { ‘ + ake ;: ; be | | Bey Saks ees ae PUSS tel Soe & f j | ! esate: ! | ede i ' i + i i] ‘ } i | ¥ pot hy ek eM fiw Pee ea ee ed t ee See es oan aaa meee ceed Cee t t i | ' TSO eR OL Mims Ce UT sles | ‘ fe | { 4s } 1 | | + hot Psu At iad Beene stl! ; siidant SRS Hee See a 4 i ‘ So ea Cle aa aia cere earl acuta oats oa Cee eS + t fea ey He ee EO 7 UE f / 4 j ; - : : : | ne eee a ee) asere Beitr Recep r MW DEG SIN OnE SU pRN akeve UE. SMa baba Patt os i Sastet Laat 1 ' pane te nent 1 7 ' f i f a So | ' +e \ 1 r { 1. is j wae prctt calsiqiy | tans ea teste tee RES Wins Bele ceps leew tre oe en ! { | i | Sh: + sft epic emtbee | } | apes ee eet ed 4 } pb toel Oe Sy Con: 1 | | i ) + oon piece oe SE beg eisSinl dd: f PS - | } ; } setts eater foo we oes Soe: es Sars 4 Wa —peh=+ or oor oe j En z 1 ihe be | sarfeerhere t 1 i ' | f | yl PBA SS ] ' ' Si oacerd boa On Gunite we oat Saban us 4 \ } i ——tL- sense etepteie rH echt f | ee ieee ened rene ; i | pict } i ce ui | |. coed a +4 | \¢ a tobe nit stl ) ie \ + vt ‘ } } i ! 1 } } 1 + Pt Fees j 7 4 ) ve NE, pote a Se eens ene epee pads teeta n } } j rte es it , x 4 $44 4 aos sity Fai AGE ALE feted f See Sal i] _& sas — tte vs taad ing no} Ya Sas Hag! Hatin ons USS Elis 4 i j if T LLP rT uivsens ts sal f } fas Penk Pen AG RESIS See 0 i { = stahead
Mit KI aus der Originaldatei erstellt — kann Fehler enthalten.
Automatische Übersetzung — das Originaldokument ist auf Englisch. Auf Englisch ansehen →
Quelle: US-Kriegsministerium / AARO — gemeinfrei · war.gov/ufo